Search for: "State v. GC" Results 241 - 260 of 462
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Expedia Inc., 2014 ONSC 2073 http://t.co/AG81lXcEJB -> BEWARE – Why You Need to Know About Canada's New Anti-Spam Legislation http://t.co/vCipGEmgsQ v -> EU Member state court has jurisdiction to try copyright case where damage occurs Hi Hotel HCF [2014] EUECJ C-387/12 http://t.co/ul8Qn7XH9F -> Can Comics Copyright Comedy? [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:00 pm
By contrast, both OHIM bodies and GC have a duty to conduct a full review of the national law particulars submitted by parties, obtaining information about the national law of the Member State concerned on their own motion for the purposes of assessing the accuracy of the facts adduced or the probative value of the documents submitted [Edwin v OHIM, Case C‑263/09 P], as the GC did by looking through Italian law and case law on probative value… [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Indeed, while under Article 52(1)(a) CTMR the application date is the seminal moment for the examination invalidity grounds, examiners and Courts are free to consider any material subsequent to the date of application insofar as it enables conclusions to be drawn with regard to the situation as it was on that date [see the CJEU’s orders in Alcon v OHIM, in Case C-192/03P, and Torresan v OHIM, in Case C-5/10]. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:00 pm by JD Hull
Down-on-their-luck David & Son, with hungry counsel, v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Union Can Offer Gift Card to Entice Employees to Strike, says NLRB’s GC – Columbus lawyer Nelson Cary of Vorys on the firm’s blog, Vorys on Labor Leasing Trends in 2013 – Cincinnati lawyer Scott Kadish of Ulmer Berne on the firm’s Real Estate Advisor Law Blog  SEC CustodyFest Vol. 2: Electric Boogaloo – Raleigh attorney David Smyth of Brooks Pierce on their blog, Cady Bar the Door TCPA, Preemption, and the First Amendment:… [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:47 am by Joy Waltemath
A former general counsel of a diagnostic lab, who participated in a qui tam action, violated his ethical obligations under the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, ruled the Second Circuit (United States of America v Quest Diagnostics, Inc, October 25, 2013, Cabranes, J). [read post]