Search for: "State v. Greenfield" Results 241 - 260 of 399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2013, 11:14 am by Jeff Gamso
(H/t to Greenfield for pointing me to it a couple of years ago.) [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:05 am by Blake Van Santen
Linda Thomas-Greenfield stated that the U.S. delegation did not agree with everything in the resolution but that it supports “some of the critical objectives in this non-binding resolution. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 10:42 am by Amy Treppass and Michael D. Smith
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) recently considered the issue of covert recordings in Phoenix House Ltd v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 1:18 pm
Sharkey1625 STATE INNOVATION AND PREEMPTION: LESSONS FROM STATE CLIMATE CHANGE EFFORTSAlexandra B. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 12:10 pm
Scott Greenfield wonders whether the news signals the end of the duopoly. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:00 pm by Eric Turkewitz
Scott Greenfield, Simple Justice, http://blog.simplejustice.us/2011/05/13/rakofsky-v-internet/, May 11, 2011. 4. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 3:26 am
  Notes: Scott Greenfield may have given up on the hope of finding extreme jurors of any stripe in voir dire. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
They know damn well that the working-poor accused who makes bail, if he is forced to hire counsel, is going to have no choice but to hire a criminal pretender.The solution is obvious: offer appointed counsel to the working poor, conditioned on their reimbursing the state as much as they can (that is, paying the state what they would otherwise pay criminal pretense lawyers).Technorati Tags: courts, criminal defense, criminal pretense [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:23 am by Carolyn Elefant
Gura took the case from its humble origins in federal district court to a landmark win in District v. [read post]