Search for: "State v. Harold"
Results 241 - 260
of 684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
The Appeals Court decision in Allen v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:18 am
He likens this notion to Bluman v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 8:27 am
Tanfield v. [read post]
Second Circuit Affirms Official Acts Immunity for Pakistani ISI Chiefs; Rejects Jus Cogens Exception
29 Aug 2014, 11:28 am
The issue will continue to be debated amongst international lawyers and in the courts and is likely ultimately to require resolution inside the United States by the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 3:22 am
The plaintiffs contended that because they had completed the swap contracts transactions in the United States, the swap transactions represented “domestic transactions” within the meaning of the “second prong” of the Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:12 am
Harold Greene is being celebrated as a “martyr” in his local village, located in a district with a heavy Taliban presence. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:20 am
: Congress v. the Supreme Court Damon Root, Overruled: The Long War for Control of the U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
See, e.g., Ridpath v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:15 am
In 2006, years before the Snowden revelations, the European Court of Human Rights held in Weber v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:46 pm
The president then went trolling for a lawyer who would say the opposite, and found, of all people, State Department legal advisor Harold Koh, who had built his academic career on arguing that the Constitution forbids the president from acting unilaterally in national security matters. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
See generally Harold C. [read post]
22 May 2014, 6:25 am
This time out, he explores how the ACA's Medicaid enrollment expansion has affected even those states which didn't opt in to it.■ For some reason, I always smile when I see posts from Wing of Zock. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:42 am
Schrodt v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 7:06 am
” Unites States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:24 am
See, Gunn v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:37 am
This leaves open the possibility that in place of official selective disclosures, the government may simply rely more heavily on leaks (under Wilson v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 11:12 pm
Not one judge has so far considered this patent valid, other than Judge Koh, of course.And Morrison & Foerster's Harold McElhinny (whose Apple v. [read post]
