Search for: "State v. Kong " Results 241 - 260 of 862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2021, 4:32 am by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Hong Kong Evan P Jowers v Robert Emmett Kinney [2019] HKCFI a case concerning summons for the production of documents, dismissed because it was too wide. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:59 am by Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
An article on Conventus LawOne asks the question “One Step Closer To A Right To Be Forgotten In Hong Kong? [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Farzaneh Badiei
But how is Apple’s App Store governed in the two nation-states? [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Hong Kong On 8 September 2017 the Hong Kong Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Chang Wa Shan v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 10:59 am by Emily Dai
Dawn Zoldi wrote about the case RaceDayQuads v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
The Home Office rejected the request, stating that it is not in the public interest to disclose any of the requested information. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Hong Kong Hong Kong finance chief Paul Chan and his wife have won an appeal court ruling in a defamation case that stems from allegations of cheating in 2011 at a school their daughter attended (see Jonathan Lu and Others v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Hong Kong The DLA Piper Privacy Matters Blog has covered developments in Hong Kong’s data protection regime. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 7:42 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Back in 2014, when the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in R. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:12 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil PracticeHong Kong Corporate Parent Not Necessary Party In Suit Over Ownership of Equity Interest in Firm DiChiara v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon  Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]