Search for: "State v. Lessing"
Results 241 - 260
of 38,618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
Ultimately, however, the Order is notable less for its immediate impact on ISPs than for the long-term structural change it represents. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
One person who fulfills both capacities will necessarily have less time and attention to devote to any singular role, leading to less effective management of legal risks. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTE [1] Basic v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:42 pm
VILER, Appellants, v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
With different approaches to confidentiality within Europe (and the world), these UPCKats are interested to see how confidentiality rules are already crystallising at the UPC just less than a year after the court opening. [read post]
10 May 2024, 10:38 am
The car owners in this case had argued that due process does give them a right to a prompt hearing under Mathews v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:35 am
[7] Maslowski et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 12:38 pm
Related Cases: Google v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am
The easiest way to make a single webpage conform to WCAG requirements is to reduce its complexity and functionality, because the less it does the fewer things must be done to meet those requirements. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:36 am
In Pinn v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:05 pm
For example, in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Based on Supreme Court precedent, the extended statute of limitations will not apply to criminal prosecution of sanctions violations that have already become time-barred, but the effect on potential civil liability is less clear. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:25 pm
Prominent historical examples, like the liberal justices who advanced press freedom in New York Times v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
Interstate travel to get an abortion is a less costly alternative form of foot voting for many women. [read post]