Search for: "State v. McDonnell" Results 241 - 260 of 639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2017, 4:30 am by Donna Ballman
Thus, unlike in a typical case under Title VII involving the burden-shifting method of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:29 am by Michael C. Dorf
A judge or jury must then decide what the real reason for the firing was.The Supreme Court laid out the framework for adjudicating such cases in its 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 11:54 am by Liisa Speaker
It upheld the lower court decision.The dissent, written by Judge Servitto, referred to a US Supreme Court case McDonnell Douglas Corp v Green, 411 US 792, as a framework for evaluating age-discrimination claims. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Bouaphakeo (and more); Steven Calabresi on originalism and liberty; Steven Eagle on wetlands law; Harvey Silverglate and Emma Quinn-Judge on McDonnell and honest-services-fraud prosecutions of state and local officials; and Glenn Reynolds looking ahead to this (2016-17) term; Federal agency can’t unilaterally rewrite unambiguous statutory provision [Ilya Shapiro and Frank Garrison on Cato certiorari amicus in FLSA tip-pooling case of National Restaurant Association… [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:26 am by Joy Waltemath
A female police officer brought suit against municipal employer alleging gender discrimination and retaliation in violation of state law. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
In the Kentucky Law Journal, law student Jordan Shewmaker looks at Honeycutt v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:32 am by Joy Waltemath
In limited circumstances like these, said the court, “the fundamental principle of access to courts must bow to the fact that a nation without sound intelligence is a nation at risk” (Abilt v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 9:29 pm by Sme
Simplot Co. (10th Cir., Dec. 15, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Simplot on Jackson's pregnancy discrimination claim, under the McDonnell Douglas test)*Ewing v. [read post]