Search for: "State v. Rider"
Results 241 - 260
of 797
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
In Janus v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 5:16 pm
Additional Resources: Hahn v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 5:16 pm
Additional Resources: Hahn v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 2:52 pm
” (Ramos v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 8:07 am
Facts: This case (MCMANUS v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:14 am
In Crisp v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:52 am
In last year’s Meyer v. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 6:27 am
There's not much you can't say . . .State v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:35 am
” The Abood Court said that a state could balance managing its employees and labor interests to avoid “free rider” situations where non-union workers benefited from a union’s advocacy for pay raises and other benefits without paying for the negotiation process. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 am
In the Unites States, a federal judge followed the same line of reasoning in the case Razak v Uber when he decided that Uber drivers are independent contractors because they “work when they want to and are free to nap, run personal errands, or take smoke breaks between trips”. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:33 am
Spay v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 5:50 am
In Funches v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:45 pm
A final approach may entail handing back more regulatory power to the states and localities, creating a natural experiment of the type described by Justice Louis Brandeis in New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:01 pm
In Tele2 Sverige AB v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 6:04 am
And there’s a good reason for that: “legislative vetoes” and other conditional authorizations that try to circumvent the normal legislative process are generally seen as unconstitutional under the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 11:38 am
In the recent case of Heller v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:07 am
There were over 1,700 Uber drivers operating during that time and they served over 700,000 riders during that time. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:24 pm
A simple rider on an appropriations bill could add the seven little words that statu [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 11:59 am
In 2009, in Ricci v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Supreme Court agreed to review Janus v. [read post]
