Search for: "State v. Rome"
Results 241 - 260
of 592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2009, 12:49 pm
Thus, the Holy See could not be sued simply for promulgating the 1962 policy in Rome. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:10 pm
Pre-Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Court has rendered a decision in the case of Prosecutor v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:48 pm
Of particular interest is the AG’s reference to Regulation (EC) No. 593/2008 (Rome I Regulation) (para. 67 et seq.) which is used as an additional argument supporting her opinion: She stresses that - by interpreting the notion of “services” - also the Rome I Regulation has to be taken into consideration in order to prevent an interpretation being contrary to the aims of Rome I since Recital No. 7 of the Rome I Regulation… [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:02 am
In that circumstance, ruling in favour of the plaintiff, the Court of First Instance of Rome (Trib. of Rome 23 June 1984 in Foro.It 1985) acknowledged the undeniable right of the author under Article 20 of the Italian Copyright Act(integrity right) to oppose the circulation of those versions of the movie he did not directly take care of. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm
Since 2009, Kiko has been accusing Wycon (previously known as Wjcon) of copying its concept stores before the Courts of Rome and Milan but, on those occasions, unsuccessfully. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
| Feilin v. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 6:24 am
After all, those two States (unlike, say, Germany) aren’t even parties to the Rome Statute that created the ICC. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
That doctrine comes into play when: (1) the federal plaintiff lost in state court; (2) the plaintiff complains of some injury from the state court judgment; (3) the state court judgment antedated the filing of the federal case; and (4) the plaintiff is inviting the federal court to reject the state court judgment. The plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Third Circuit, and that’s where we are today: Johnson v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
LUISS “Guido Carli” University of Rome. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
Finesse Wireless LLC v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:23 pm
Opinion on SGAE v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
”89 The court confirmed this understanding of the section 4(a) bailout provision by citing to the Supreme Court’s City of Rome case, in which the Court held that the city of Rome, Georgia, “was ineligible to seek bailout because the coverage formula of § 4(b) ha[d] never been applied to it. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:29 pm
Igo's The Known Citizen: A History of Privacy in Modern America, Cyrus Farivar's Habeas Data: Privacy vs. the Rise of Surveillance Tech, Mary Ziegler's Beyond Abortion: Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 6:42 pm
Justice Rouleau stated in O’Donohue v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:33 pm
Never Too Late 118 [week ending on Sunday 16 October] | Rome Court of First Instance rules that copyright exceptions for news reporting and criticism/review do not apply to entertainment TV programmes | It's a gas! [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 3:19 am
Rome II-Regulation provides for the possibility to rely on the place of the event that has given rise to the damages as a connecting-factor for collective redress cases in which mass damages have occurred in different states. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court heard arguments in Fulton v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:20 pm
The case is Coleman v. [read post]
