Search for: "State v. So " Results 241 - 260 of 117,335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In doing so, the Court held that insurers with financial responsibility for bankruptcy claims are “parties in interest” under the United States Bankruptcy Code and, therefore, may appear and be heard, including to object to Chapter 11 reorganization plans. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
The Labour party is proposing to strengthen the protections for all workers with regard to TUPE and so it would seem unlikely that they would proceed with the first clarification. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:10 pm by lennyesq
  We are further concerned that they have done so in an effort to pressure Columbia to more harshly punish student protesters and police the ideological composition of its faculty—goals that implicate the free speech rights of members of the Columbia community and of the university itself. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 7:57 am by Professor Alberto Bernabe
  If they were corporate records that the client gave the lawyer to store, there is no reason to believe that they are protected by the attorney-client privilege, so calling them so would be a mistake. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The merger was negotiated while the entire sports betting industry held its breath; the Supreme Court was considering Murphy v National Collegiate Athletic Assn, 584 U.S. 453 (2018) the case that allowed states to legalize sports gambling. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Arnold LJ dissented, considering that the relevant event/state of affairs cannot be overcome by an offer of non-contractual performance. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, Justice Sotomayor’s opinion for the Court last year in Dubin v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm by Béligh Elbalti
However, before doing so, some light should be shed on the proceedings before the Canadian court. [read post]