Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer"
Results 241 - 260
of 3,074
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
Justice Thomas recently, in an almost off-handed fashion, made several important observations: Speaking...at the University of Florida law school, Thomas said the Court's decisions should be questioned, but he is bothered by rhetoric suggesting its justices have ulterior motives, the Associated Press reports.He is correct to object that we (legal types) are too quick to suspect the motives of Supreme Court justices. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm
"Wallenstein’s observation about how much and how little changes comes to mind in considering another significant Supreme Court case about impermissible race discrimination and family life, Palmore v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 8:40 am
It's not something I expect Democrats to say out loud, but I'm sure Biden's people know that. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
Reflections from the oral argument Much to the surprise of nearly all observers, the case seems to be falling along the Supreme Court's reported ideological lines: the conservative justices support the taxpayers while the liberal justices support the government. [read post]
14 May 2023, 2:14 pm
Here's the intro to SCOTUSblog summary:For decades, the Supreme Court has steadily narrowed the scope of the federal criminal wire fraud statutes, and Thursday’s decision in Ciminelli v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
(if all the provision's conditions are met). [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
Please address the Supreme Court's recent discussion of stare decisis in Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 2:33 pm
[NY Observer] * Checking in on the always messed up developments down at Manhattan Supreme Court. [read post]
30 May 2015, 11:01 am
Earlier this week, Supreme Court of Canada Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin gave the fourth annual Pluralism Lecture of the Global Centre for Pluralism, founded in 2006 by the Aga Khan, spiritual leader of Ismaili Muslims.In that speech, Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin described what she called the attempt by Canadian governments since the 19th century to commit “cultural genocide” against aboriginal peoples.According to a May 28th article in the Globe and Mail,… [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:57 am
According to the court's opinion, the employer had concluded that the employee had stolen property and that conclusion became passed around the workplace. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 5:57 am
Before a federal court in Connecticut, one defendant convicted of violent crimes argued: [A] reasonable officer should have seen the writing on the wall after the Supreme Court's decisions in Kyllo v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm
The First Circuit’s ruling in Moore-Bush leaves intact the court's earlier precedent in U.S. v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 3:15 pm
My point in this blog post is not to focus deeply on the Supreme Court's case or the law behind it. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 9:47 am
" I would have thought that the delight would come had the book been found on the king's corpse.Do these observations have any relation to my interests in constitutional law and politics? [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 8:05 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
Once again, the RCMP calls for warrantless access to your online info. Once again, the RCMP is wrong
26 Nov 2015, 4:07 am
It's that simple.Mounting public concern In June last year, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled police must have a judge's authorization to obtain customer data linked to online activities. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 1:53 pm
There’s generally no right to appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 May 2014, 4:02 pm
In People v Callahan, it was held that appellate courts are also entrusted with the responsibility to oversee the plea bargaining process, and must examine the record to ensure that the defendant's waiver of the right to appeal reflects a knowing and voluntary choice. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 1:21 pm
We learned last evening that it would be up to the Supreme Court to name a new judge in the Lake County early votting case, after the two sides failed to agree on a judge before yesterday's 3:00 PM deadline. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 6:31 pm
Baker have overlooked a fundamental premise of the Court's reasoning, namely, that most punitive damages awards are infrequent, have not increased in recent years, and are generally lower than the amount of compensatory damages.Personally, I find this aspect of the Supreme Court's opinion very ironic. [read post]
