Search for: "T&F General Contracting, Inc." Results 241 - 260 of 1,450
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am by Editor Charlie
 Introduction The following Comments are respectfully submitted by the signatory organizations Songwriters Guild of America, Inc. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 8:09 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Norwest Mortg., Inc., 243 F.3d 130, 144 (3d Cir. 2001), abrogated on other grounds by Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 7:29 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Grubhub Holding, Inc., 970 F.3d 798 (7th Cir. 2020), but breaks with decisions issued by the First and Ninth Circuits—inches this important issue closer to the type of circuit split that might command attention from the U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Consider, for instance, the Federal Arbitration Act's exemption for "contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
  Haelan could have sued the players for breach of contract, but it didn’t want them to alienate them. [read post]
21 May 2021, 9:06 am by Georges Legrand
It was a contract welding firm engaged in steel fabrication, repairs to drilling equipment, and general contract welding work. [read post]
21 May 2021, 9:06 am by Georges Legrand
It was a contract welding firm engaged in steel fabrication, repairs to drilling equipment, and general contract welding work. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:53 am by Russell Knight
“[T]he burden of proving duress is on the person asserting it. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 6:58 am
OSHRC, 166 F.3d 815, 818 (6th Cir.1998) (citing the OSHRC’s 1979 Haugan case for proposition that “[t]here is a presumption that a general contractor has sufficient control over its subcontractors to require them to comply with safety standards”) – but StormForce announced that this presumption would no longer be used: “We thus overrule Haugan to the extent that its formulation of a ‘rebuttable presumption’ is inconsistent with… [read post]