Search for: "TOTAL COMPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC." Results 241 - 260 of 418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2014, 6:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
And, based on Ravn and Daifotis, inlight of Riis’s total-dose concept, there were only a “finitenumber of identified, predictable solutions. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 11:29 am
And, based on Ravn and Daifotis, in light of Riis’s total-dose concept [in which a daily dosage over a month may be the equivalent of a single monthly dosage], there were only a “finite number of identified, predictable solutions. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 1:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  The month A-Penalty amount generally will equal the result of the total number of all full-time employees of the employer minus 30, multiplied by $165 per month. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:51 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Limited, non-exclusive right to republished granted to Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:37 am by Ben Vernia
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. further agreed to implement and maintain a number of enhanced compliance measures, including making publicly available the results of certain clinical trials and requiring an annual review and certification of its compliance efforts by the Chief Executive Officer of its parent company, Endo Health Solutions. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:39 am by Steven Buchwald
Oracle USA, Inc. v Rimini St., Inc, 2014 WL 576097 (D. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:39 am by Steven Buchwald
Oracle USA, Inc. v Rimini St., Inc, 2014 WL 576097 (D. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:39 am by Steven Buchwald
Oracle USA, Inc. v Rimini St., Inc, 2014 WL 576097 (D. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 12:52 am by Submitted Posting
Eva Lehman, VP Litigation and Chief Compliance Officer, Western Digital Corporation Frederick Egler Jr., Chief Counsel – Litigation, The PNC Financial Services Group Steve Taub, Assistant General Counsel, U-Haul International, Inc. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:11 am by Terry Hart
Measuring compliance with a lesser “objective reasonableness” standard would be inconsistent with Congress’s apparent intent that the statute protect potential violators from subjectively improper actions by copyright owners. [read post]