Search for: "U. S. SUPREME COURT" Results 241 - 260 of 8,716
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
The Supreme Courts Wetland Saga Continues July 13, 2023 | Monika U. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 2:59 pm by David Badertscher
In his December 22,2023 posting, to this service,  A Holiday Guide to Donald Trump’s Latest Cases at the Supreme court,  “he points out that the U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:57 pm by Steven Calabresi
Supreme Court justices, and their colleagues on the lower federal courts, ought to be paid more. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm by Orin S. Kerr
That's a search, the New York Court of Appeals ruled: Applying the Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment jurisprudence to the instant case, we hold that the use of a canine to sniff defendant's body for the presence of narcotics qualified as a search. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 5:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Holland & Knight LLC v Walsam 316, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 33748(U)October 17, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 654470/2022 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:15 pm by Chad Landmon
Court of appeals for the Federal Circuit or the Supreme Court, they can be an important proving ground for the decisions rendered by those courts. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:15 pm by Chad Landmon
Court of appeals for the Federal Circuit or the Supreme Court, they can be an important proving ground for the decisions rendered by those courts. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am by Amy Howe
It argued that the lower court had misapplied the Supreme Courts 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:23 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Founding American myths of the righteousness of conquest and of Manifest Destiny both fed and were propagated by the Marshall Trilogy, the suite of Supreme Court opinions (1823 –1832) at the root of U. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
On the one hand, it would be a waste to raise it before the court u/s 11 because the court would, in any case, let the tribunal decide. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:54 pm by Paul Maharg
The project would never have come about but for the trust built through solid liaison work between the Supreme Court of NH and John Garvey and his colleagues. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:07 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
[The Supreme Court's first decision of the term does not decide very much.] [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Jude McCormick – the chancellor of Delaware – and, eventually, the five members of the state Supreme Court. [read post]