Search for: "UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES" Results 241 - 260 of 3,031
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Later, his brother-in-law is beaten by men in paramilitary uniforms, kidnapped, and never seen again. [read post]
27 May 2022, 4:00 am by James Hoffman, Esq
§ 10-604(b).[3] As stated by the District Court of Maryland, the conduct proscribed by the current statute was first made a statutory offense in Maryland in 1908. [read post]
17 May 2022, 3:38 am by Jan von Hein
Since 2014 the American Law Institute2 now seeks to draft a new “Restatement” – the Third – of the subject, with the aim to clarify and perhaps to bring more uniformity to the resolution of conflict-of-laws problems. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:22 pm by John Ross
Foie-gras producers don't like the district court's ruling that California's foie-gras ban is constitutional. [read post]
11 May 2022, 9:45 am by Eric Fruits
That was a stretch, and the district court judge was having none of that in ruling that: “The antitrust laws fully apply to the labor markets, and price-fixing agreements among buyers … are prohibited by the Sherman Act. [read post]
9 May 2022, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Salar Atrizadeh
For example, the State of Alabama filed a lawsuit in district court against the United States Census Bureau regarding this new mechanism’s viability. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In the late 60s the Commissioners on Uniform State Laws had approved a Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, and the American Law Institute then proposed a statute explicitly empowering federal courts to certify questions to state courts if the states in question had procedures permitting the answer of certified questions. [read post]
6 May 2022, 9:21 am by Eugene Volokh
Furthermore, with regard to the unborn plaintiffs' standing as a "person" under § 11-3-4, before the RPA was enacted, the entirety of the criminal-abortion statute—which, in part, prohibited the "[p]rocuring, counseling, or attempting miscarriage"—was declared unconstitutional under the United States Constitution by the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:01 pm by Kacyn H. Fujii
Circuit also rejected the district court’s interpretation of the legislative history, because it was too ambiguous to find Congress’s “specific intent. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:03 am by Emma Snell
Data from open sources is untested at the International Criminal Court and has been tossed out by national courts in some cases. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:48 am by Jim Dempsey
” In the case of the coronavirus pandemic, while the Florida district court struck down the mask mandate, the Supreme Court and the U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Farzaneh Badiei
For example, app store providers can take down insecure or known malicious apps, or can impose a uniform and strict security requirement on apps, increasing overall app security. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm by Alice Colarossi
In March 2022, the US District Court for the District of Delaware directed the entry of summary judgment in favor of our client, plaintiff Bank of America Europe D.A.C. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:36 am by Eric Goldman
” Chris Cox “Congress enacted §230 for the express purpose of overturning a state court ruling that required a platform to be a mere conduit to avoid liability for user posts…. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:24 am by Kevin LaCroix
The appellate court’s affirmance of the district court’s dismissal in this case bespeaks a high degree of judicial unwillingness to entertain questions about earlier statements based on subsequent events. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:06 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
Thus, the district court’s ruling in Biden v Texas should have (at most) bound the federal government only in Texas and Missouri, in keeping with the court’s modest role as one district court granting relief to the parties before it. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:57 am by Ronald Mann
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, for example, suggested to Geyser a reluctance to “announce a rule that says your laws have to be uniform all the time,” paired with a “gut feeling” that Congress shouldn’t be able to say “this state is going to let the taxpayers pay for something, and the other 48 states don’t have that choice” because businesses must pay the costs themselves. [read post]
The District Court ruled in the Circuit City trustee’s favor, and the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed and remanded the case. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
Similarly, the District Court had rejected the agencies’ arguments regarding the TRIG questions. [read post]
The district court agreed and entered judgment without a trial in the employer’s favor. [read post]