Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WAGES" Results 241 - 260 of 399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2014, 12:13 am
The truly desperate state of biodiversity and climate change law has apparently prompted some very rich countries (especially the United States) to behave as if these sources of truly irreparable environmental harm defy meaningful precautions. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 12:13 am
The truly desperate state of biodiversity and climate change law has apparently prompted some very rich countries (especially the United States) to behave as if these sources of truly irreparable environmental harm defy meaningful precautions. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:21 am by David DePaolo
Though the new law doesn't apply to the case, the opinion is in line with the new law.The court said that the unambiguous language of NAFTA provides that only the United States may challenge a state law as conflicting with the terms of the agreement between it, Mexico and Canada. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 7:46 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case is out of the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, McAllen Division. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 9:11 am by Admin
He has been certified as an employment law specialist by the Ohio State Bar Association and has been listed in Best Lawyers in America since 2006. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
Since the United States Supreme Court recognized agency amicus interpretations as a source of controlling law entitled to deference in Auer v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 9:14 am by Jon Gelman
Earlier this week, the Wage and Hour Division made a few revisions to some of our guidance documents that reflect changes to our enforcement of the FMLA in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:40 am by Jon Hyman
Last week, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York agreed. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Women’s Equality Act: Nuts and Bolts The proposed changes, and the circumstances that justify them, are as follows: Pay Equity: The bill would amend the state’s equal pay law in three ways calculated to reduce the existing gender wage gap. [read post]