Search for: "US v. John Oliver"
Results 241 - 260
of 393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Many readers may be familiar with John Oliver’s recent comic segment, re-enacting a Supreme Court argument using dogs in place of the Justices and attorneys. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:42 am
Clip from Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, Oct. 19, 2014.Oliver and his team didn't stop with a cute video of their own. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:01 am
Briefly: Last Week Tonight With John Oliver (video, occasional profanity) reenacts the oral argument in Holt v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 10:20 am
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 1:19 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
Question: In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:44 pm
El juez tenía facultades sancionatorias, y las usó a fondo: lo excluyó de la matrícula al abogado Bradley. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 8:21 am
A recent case, Oliver et al., v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
The constitutionality of having scientists, or specially qualified judges, serve as fact finders has never been clearly addressed.[6] Other commentators have argued in favor of the existing set of judicial tools, such as appointment of testifying “neutral” expert witnesses and scientific advisors for trial judges.[7] These approaches have been generally available in federal and some state trial courts, but they have rarely been used. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
Finally, on the lighter side, Paul gave us a highly entertaining video, in which John Oliver explains net neutrality, and he also shared an article by Michael Stern considering how President George Washington would have replied to a House of Representatives request for documents from his Office of Legal Counsel—if he had had one. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:05 pm
Writing for a 6-member majority, Chief Justice John G. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:56 pm
Se trataba de John W. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm
Oliver. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 383 US 1 (1966) At the outset it must be remembered that the federal patent power stems from a specific constitutional provision which authorizes the Congress “To promote the Progress of . . . useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to . . . [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
– Fisher v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Citrus Community College District, 131 P.3d 383 (Cal. 2006)), to the legality of fantasy baseball's use of player names and information (CBC Distribution & Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
A: On July 13, 1836, US Patent Number 1 was issued to John Ruggles for traction wheels. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
” In that regard, what have you noticed about the assignment of opinions by Chief Justice John Roberts since he came on the Court in September 2005? [read post]
