Search for: "US v. Miller" Results 241 - 260 of 4,785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2012, 6:11 am by Bill Otis
The New York Times had a predictable, gushing editorial in praise of the SCOTUS decision in Miller v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:04 pm
§2669(c), permitted the Department to exempt Miller from the protections of the ADEA *** The court explained that “Congress would not have used ambiguous language had it intended to override the ADEA is confirmed by considering the language that Congress did use when it intended to carve out exceptions from that statute … when Congress had such an intention, it made that intention clear. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
He says that the Government’s attempt to effect these changes using the royal prerogative offends the imperative rule of our constitution. 15.18 The Lord Advocate for the Scottish Government, the Rt Hon W. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:14 am by Steven M. Gursten
ICLE 2010 download No. 10 for personal injury attorneys, from State Bar of Michigan seminar in Grand Rapids on helping lawyers find the value in auto accident cases Take a look at the supporting letter used in Steve Gursten’s presentation in Grand Rapids, “Representing Injured Personal Injury Victims and Finding Value in Car Accident Claims After McCormick v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:32 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Colin Miller, one of my favorite bloggers on evidence, addresses a best evidence issue raised in People v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 10:41 am by Viking
  His premise quite simply is that we are back to Ohio v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:25 am
They can also be made against manufacturer's of products used on construction sites, which are defective and unreasonably dangerous. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:17 pm
" In his concurrence, Chief Justice Hassell, while joining the court's opinion, wrote, "However, I write separately to state that I have serious concerns about the Court of Appeals' opinion in the former appeal, Miller-Jenkins v. [read post]