Search for: "US v. Peter Smith"
Results 241 - 260
of 538
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Many modern longitudinal epidemiologic studies and clinical trials use survival analysis and time windows to identify latency or time lagged outcomes in association with identified exposures. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:42 am
Jonas Anderson and Peter Menell discuss the Court’s recent decision in Teva Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit 2008) (quoting Smith v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:23 am
Accordingly, dismissal of both the fraud and breach of fiduciary duty claims was warranted (see generally Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney Inc., 88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996]). [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
At first instance,covered by the IPKat here, Peter Smith J (English judges usually only get a surname – unless there is another judge around with the same one, like, in this case, Sir Andrew Smith) dismissed almost all of Mattel’s claims: there was no infringement of Mattel's two SCRABBLE marks (and no passing off) by the use of SCRAMBLE or SCRAMBLE WITH FRIENDS. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
Smith, Citizenship and the Fourteenth Amendment, 34 San Diego L. [read post]
Case Law, Canada: Baglow v Smith, defence of “fair comment” succeeds in landmark blogging libel case
4 Mar 2015, 4:50 pm
The long running and high profile “blogger defamation” case of Baglow v Smith has been determined in the defendant’s favour. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
In contrast, on Free Dominion, the second and third defendants had a post entitled “6 ways Baglow v Smith helped save the Internets! [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:30 am
Smith v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
Randy Smith accusing the panel's majority of writing new law saying "We have never held that an actress' performance could be copyrightable". [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
This brings us to the second enquiry; which is, 2dly. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Most warnings concern a product’s use – that if you use (or don’t use) the product in a certain way, you are likely to get hurt; and if you follow the warning, you won’t. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
ABKCO v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:05 pm
(And another in Smith v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:22 pm
Smith v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm
Smith has appealed to the Ninth Circuit, and her original counsel, Peter J. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
This is a book review of Patent Law In Greater China, edited by Stefan Luginbuehl and Peter Ganea. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
