Search for: "US v. Potter" Results 241 - 260 of 641
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2019, 3:16 am by ASAD KHAN
Notably, the court commended paras 186 and 187 of the protocol and Sir Mark Potter commended them as particularly instructive for those requested to supply medical reports in relation to alleged torture. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 3:06 am by INFORRM
He said that the language used in the posts was “excessive” and the publication itself “lacked reasonableness”. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Harry Potter Lexicon: “Perhaps b/c [D] is such a Harry Potter enthusiast, the Lexicon often lacks restraint in using Rowling’s original expression” Salinger v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 9:57 pm
Second, if you read that article, you will note that the doctrine has been used in only a few contexts. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am by Matrix Law
The Court will determine whether the Court of Appeal erred in failing to hold that the claimants were entitled to a remedy in the tort of private nuisance by reason of the Tate Modern’s use of the top floor of its Blavatnik Building as a viewing platform. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
The title must begin with the words "Harry Potter and the ... [read post]