Search for: "United States v. Barnes"
Results 241 - 260
of 803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2010, 6:44 am
United States, the Court “explored various approaches to determine whether residents are predominantly students and therefore exempt from paying into Social Security or employees and liable” for those payments. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted Uber’s motion and dismissed the lawsuit. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 4:25 am
On April 28, 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided Salazar v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court in AT&T v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Taha &Sohaib Khan, Charity Disparity: The Challenge of Applying Religious Law on Zakat in the United States, (Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2018).Michael A. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:47 pm
" United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
In its appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Indiana v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes kicks off a periodic series on the practical impact of the Court’s decisions by looking at the campaign finance rulings culminating in Citizens United. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 8:26 am
Also known as the Johnson-Reed Act, the law replaced and expanded on the temporary Emergency Quota Act of 1921, which for the first time placed annual caps on the number of immigrants admitted to the United States and set a national origins quota system for newly arriving immigrants.U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm
This is an appeal from an amended opinion and order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, dismissing at the pleadings stage all federal claims against the defendants on qualified immunity grounds because the plaintiffs had not adequately alleged that their constitutional rights were violated, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “extraordinary developments in Wisconsin,” where partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm
United Mktg. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am
United States, which stems from the federal government’s failure to fully reimburse health insurance companies for losses created as a result of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the “theme out of the United States Supreme Court [yesterday was] materiality. [read post]
