Search for: "United States v. Brake"
Results 241 - 260
of 352
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2011, 8:02 am
" There were roughly 11.5 million vehicles sold in the United States last year, 5.9 million of which were vans, SUVs or pickups. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 8:18 am
Pettitt v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:24 pm
But, at least for now, the related case law in the United States is fundamentally better than in Germany, though this may be attributable in no small part to the historic happenstance of what cases were put before the courts in what sequence--and what questions for review the parties raised.Just so there is no misunderstanding: Dr. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 8:18 am
Lynch v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 7:48 pm
Lynch v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:22 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 7:27 pm
May, United States Bureau of Mines, in I.J. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 10:57 am
Wells posted the government’s latest en-banc rehearing petition in Al-Bahlul v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 3:32 pm
Does that mean such patents would be rejected by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) or invalidated by a court? [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:30 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:03 pm
Among the new opinions released on Thursday, August 25, 2011 was State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:03 pm
Among the new opinions released on Thursday, August 25, 2011 was State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 3:53 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Haldex Brake Products Corporation (Docket Report) E D Texas: ‘Agreement to assign’ a patent is not, by itself, actual assignment: Gellman v Telular Corporation (IP Spotlight) E D Texas: Evidence of lump sum settlements lacking per-unit royalty is inadmissible: LecTec Corporation v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
Of course, there are such lobbyists, but the description misses one of the most powerful groups, the plaintiffs’ mass tort trial bar, the largest rent-seeking group in the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
These two counts charged Laiwala with violating California Penal Code § 115(a), which provides as follows:Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony.People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:04 pm
In People v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
Midland Brake, 220 F.3d 954,961-62 (8th Cir. 2000). [read post]
