Search for: "United States v. Cover"
Results 241 - 260
of 14,037
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2024, 6:37 am
United States This special edition covers the Federal Circuit’s June 2024 protest decision in Percipient.ai, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:46 pm
Do you know what it covers? [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:46 pm
Do you know what it covers? [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
This blog extensively covered United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am
In New Breed of Patent Claim Bedevils Product Makers , DIONNE SEARCEY covered aspects of the false patent marking issue found in the Federal Circuit case Stauffer v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:51 am
The UK is not legislating extra-territorially when it covers proposals or decisions about domestic redundancies developed or taken abroad. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 6:09 pm
In Traditionalist American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:07 pm
United States, holding that the use of state convictions to impose enhanced federal sentences under the Armed Career Criminal Act depends on whether the elements of the state offense match a generic covered offense; Birchfield v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 7:50 pm
Background of Covered Business Method review Under U.S. patent laws, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) can review the validity of patents that are financial in nature under a Covered Business Method (“CBM”) review. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 5:47 pm
UnwiredPlanet, 841 F.3d at 1382.[ Appeal from the United States Patent and TrademarkOffice, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 4:07 am
United States v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 1:33 pm
United States. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:48 am
Wade — on the left.I hear Reich saying settle down and think of specific, practical things that can be done through the ordinary processes of government, which include, in the United States, federalism. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
” Some amici, such as Professor Kurt Lash, have filed briefs arguing that the presidency is not a “disqualified” office covered by the Positions Clause—in other words, that Section 3 permits someone to serve as President (or Vice-President) even if they are a covered person who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States (indeed, even if they’ve “given aid or… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
The law established by the United State Supreme court in Thomas v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:26 pm
On April 4, 2016, the California Supreme Court answered three questions certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding interpretation of the California wage order requirements for the provision of seating to employees (previously covered on the ILJ here). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 4:11 am
[Simmons Little Bluestone LP v Nationwide Insurance Co of Florida case no 2:22-cv-02822 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Western Division] [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 4:11 am
[Simmons Little Bluestone LP v Nationwide Insurance Co of Florida case no 2:22-cv-02822 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Western Division] [read post]
