Search for: "United States v. Hammer" Results 241 - 260 of 396
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2013, 7:58 am by JakeMcGowan
State AGs hammer Google over its Street View wi-fi sniffing, with a fine and, perhaps more importantly, various requirements of how Google handles privacy issues operationally. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm by Florian Mueller
But some people want the Federal Circuit to destroy intellectual property with a hammer only to deprive itself and all other courts in the United States of the opportunity to decide on interoperability based on what happens to an API after its creation and on what a defendant wants to do with it and to it.The EFF's submissions are, of course, consistent with Google's appellate brief, which even argued that intellectual property protection can be lost over time, mentioning… [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 10:00 am by Chip Merlin
The frequency of that type of loss is geographically extraordinary because it infrequently occurs in other areas of the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:28 am by Thomas Merrill
Tuesday’s oral argument in Tarrant Water District v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:51 am by Ken
United States District Judge Michael M. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:02 pm by Wells Bennett
  And he’s got chops: undergrad at Villanova, medical and doctoral degrees from Georgetown, residencies in the United States and abroad, and a postdoctoral fellowship at Stanford. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:16 pm by Pamela Vesilind
  So too is the popularity of DIY backyard slaughter, local “slaughter farms,” and mobile slaughter units (MSUs), which bring the slaughter to the animal owner. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:38 pm
Given the recent ruling United States Supreme Court decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
 Lynn said that the webinar would cover the:  Overview and analysis of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) Decision. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am by Tobias Thienel
This doctrine holds,in the broadest outline, that English (like U.S.) courts 'will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory' (Underhill v Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897)) or 'will not adjudicate upon the transactions of foreign sovereign states' (Buttes Gas Oil Co v Hammer (No 3) [1982] AC 888, 931G). [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:31 am by Rosanne Kay
In a recent appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, there is little doubt that the SEC thought its case was something of an easy win. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:34 pm by David Bernstein
Imagine, for example, if the ghost of Justice William Day, author of Hammer v. [read post]