Search for: "United States v. Henning" Results 241 - 260 of 728
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 JOAN BAYEv.MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.Civil Action No. 17-4789.United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am by Marty Lederman
  The FactsJane Doe entered the United States unaccompanied, without legal documentation, in early September. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm by Bernie Burk
  But it beggars plausibility to suggest that two deeply experienced Washington white-collar litigators, representing an embattled President of the United States on issues of the highest imaginable profile, both made the same dumbass blunder regarding intensely sensitive tactical and strategic information in a popular DC restaurant located adjacent to the offices of the New York Times. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Before sentencing, however, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the basis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in R.A.V. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:25 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Homeland Housewares, LLC (“Homeland”) petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) for an inter partes review of claims 1–16 of U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 5:28 am by Eugene Volokh
“DISH Network contracts with thousands of third-party retailers in the United States who solicit sales as authorized dealers. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a case on next term’s docket, and United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]