Search for: "United States v. Interstate Circuit" Results 241 - 260 of 1,144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2008, 2:43 pm
In this case, the Seventh Circuit should be shooting the wounded (or, at least the counsel for petitioner).The case is Illinois Bell v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:03 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
For instance, in the new Seventh Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:30 am by Beth Graham
Horton responded by filing a petition for review of the NLRB’s decision with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:12 pm by Michael S. Knoll
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that could prove pivotal to the future of regulation and interstate commerce in the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 12:02 pm by Jon Sands
[Ed. note: I am counsel for the defendant in the second decision summarized here.]United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:22 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
  The publisher of this blog has been quoted in an article discussing this case in a Law360 article authored by Linda Chiem, stating: “[T]he dissent[ing opinion in the Ninth Circuit] pointed out that the Ninth Circuit majority’s decision deviates from the First Circuit’s 2016 decision in Schwann v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:44 am by Erin Miller
United States No. 09-223, Levin v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 11:06 am by John C. Manoog III
On Appeal to the United States Supreme Court On appeal to the nation’s highest court, the Third Circuit’s order was reversed, and the case was remanded. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:49 am
”  More recently, the Tenth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:49 am
”  More recently, the Tenth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:15 pm by Ron Krauss
While reiterating its general rule that mandamus is “a drastic remedy that is seldom issued and its use is discouraged,” the Third Circuit nevertheless found “the kind of extraordinary situation in which we are empowered to issue the writ of mandamus,” in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681 (7th Cir 2010) (per curiam) (rejecting Second Amendment challenge to 18 USC § 922(g)(3), which makes it a criminal felony for one who is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance to possess a gun); United States v Seay, 620 F3d 919 (8th Cir 2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) (see also 620 F3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v Skoien,… [read post]