Search for: "United States v. Kaplan"
Results 241 - 260
of 415
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2013, 5:57 am
As we begin a week of pre-trial sessions in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
Careful and appropriate use of criminal history information is an important, and in many cases essential, part of the employment process of employers throughout the United States * * *. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 10:25 pm
” The August 20, 2013, decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Unclaimed Property Recovery Service, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
Briefly: At 1 p.m. today, Roberta Kaplan – who argued on behalf of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:43 pm
Careful and appropriate use of criminal history information is an important, and in many cases essential, part of the employment process of employers throughout the United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 7:44 am
The answer is no.The case is Palma v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:18 am
Kaplan of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied the investors’ motions to intervene. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 3:23 pm
Kaplan, Roberta Kaplan, SCOTUS, Stop and Frisk, Supreme Court, United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:04 pm
This action only dealt with benefits for gay and lesbian federal workers and their families, but government agencies that carry out some 1,100 federal laws and scores of official regulations dealing with marital benefits and opportunities also are expected to begin taking steps to implement the Court’s ruling in the case of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 6:05 am
United States [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:41 pm
United States, and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
And as we saw in the Boston Marathon bombing incident, home-grown terrorists or terrorists who are sleeper cells inside the United States are a threat. . . [read post]
22 May 2013, 10:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 12:42 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States recently granted certification in the matter of Heimeshoff v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Justice Richter found that the Supreme Court ignored its own custody schedule when it stated that the parents here shared “very nearly equal” physical custody of the child. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:28 am
Cir. 2013) (noting a party may not object to a claim construc- tion it proposed or agreed to); Lazare Kaplan Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:58 pm
United States, 554 U.S. 237, 244–45 (2008); El Paso, 526 U.S. at 479. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:12 am
Now available in redacted form: the government’s opposition brief and the defendant’s reply in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:23 am
United States HHS, 682 F.3d 1, 12 (2012). [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:31 am
In the oral argument for United States v. [read post]
