Search for: "United States v. Louis Means" Results 241 - 260 of 463
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm by Quinta Jurecic
More trouble than training, really: A Pentagon spokesman stated that under 200 moderate Syrian rebels are currently being trained by the United States. [read post]
30 May 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
While it’s been difficult to wait for the past eight months, we are now confident that the trial of the United States of America v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
By means of a reference to national law, it has the matter governed by the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPC Agreement), an international treaty signed by some of the Member States, whose Articles 25 to 27 lay down rules setting out the scope of European patents (direct and indirect infringement) and the limitations on them. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Indonesia long defined geographic-political units according to ethnicity and TCEs, part of the nation-building project. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:35 am
For example, leading Progressive Justice Louis Brandeis praised the Court’s notorious decision to uphold mandatory sterilization of the mentally ill in Buck v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 8:42 am
Kenneth continued the "Trademarks and Designs" overlap by giving an explanation of trade dress and product configuration in the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:16 pm by Amul Kalia
More importantly, it was reportedly frustration with the British resolution of 1785 authorizing the Department of Foreign Affairs to open and inspect any mail related to the safety and interests of the United States that led James Madison, Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe to write to each other in code.In fact, in the 1999 decision throwing out the government’s export regulations on encryption in EFF’s case Bernstein v. [read post]