Search for: "United States v. Marti" Results 241 - 260 of 370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
United States, a Pennsylvania woman’s challenge to her conviction for violating federal laws implementing the Chemical Weapons Convention. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which it will consider a Pennsylvania woman’s argument that the Constitution does not give Congress the power to make her conduct – an effort to poison a romantic rival – criminal, even if the federal laws in which it did so were enacted to implement an international treaty prohibiting the use and proliferation of chemical weapons. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:12 pm by Will Baude
United States, a case about a conviction under a statute that purports to implement a chemical weapons treaty. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
 ”Because the University of Alabama is a state entity, it cannot be joined in a case in federal court. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:55 am by Beth Graham
In related news, Armstrong’s former team director, Johan Bruyneel, and two former United States Postal Service cycling team doctors, Pedro Celaya and Jose Marti, will apparently face arbitration before the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) in December. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Also in FISC-related transparency news: the FISC declassified as much as it could of its latest business records telephony metadata program; I wrote about two issues dealt with in that order: Judge Claire Eagan’s “relevance” analysis in her August memorandum, and addressing Supreme Court Justices opinions in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 7:54 pm by Steve Vladeck
United States, and I have very little of substance to add to Jen Daskal’s thorough analysis over at Just Security, or Marty Lederman’s addendum thereto. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At this blog, Marty Lederman discusses the impact of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:32 am by Will Baude
  But neither Windsor nor the United States has such a problem here. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Congress responded by prohibiting the transfer or release of Guantánamo detainees to the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm by Tejinder Singh
United States, we got as close to unanimity as the week allowed. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:12 am by Benjamin Wittes
Only in 2008, Koh made the following remarks in testimony before a Senate subcommittee: the Bush Administration has consistently asserted a constitutional theory of unfettered executive power, based on extraordinarily broad interpretations of Article II’s “Commander-in-Chief” Clause and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
 In his Verdict column for Justia, Vikram David Amar analyzes the issue of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG)’s standing in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:34 pm by Ron Coleman
The company long ago established that premise in the United States, successfully forcing two restaurant companies, McBagel’s and the vegetarian McDharma’s, to change their names. . . . [read post]