Search for: "United States v. Newman"
Results 241 - 260
of 582
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
Mayo Collaborative will look at how the Majority Opinion is at odds with precedent and the most recent United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) Subject Matter Guidelines published last month. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 2:15 am
Equal pay for equal workBertoldi v State of New York, 275 AD2d 227; Motion to appeal denied, 96 NY2d 706; Motion to appeal on constitutional grounds denied, 95 NY2d 958Section 115 of the Civil Service Law provides that State employees are entitled to equal pay for equal work, and regular increases in pay in proper proportion to increase of ability, increase of output and increase of equality of work demonstrated in service.While Section 115 applies only to employees of the… [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:33 am
United. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
The Texas Supreme Court denied the landowners’ motion for rehearing last Friday in Murphy v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 7:54 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 12:29 pm
Autogenomics v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:07 pm
That holding, Judge Paez explained in his concurral opinion, flows from United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:53 am
The qui tam cases are captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:09 am
In 1996, the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission issued joint guidance in their Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 6:07 am
v=SY9PoR7-XGA.) [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 4:24 pm
November 24, 2008) (Feinberg, Newman, Cabranes, CJJ)This trio of long opinions, captioned In re Terrorist Bombings of U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 11:23 am
Weexplained that the Board’s interpretation of its regulationsin denying the proposed amendment was reasonableunder the particular circumstances in Proxyconn and wasconsistent with the United States Patent and TrademarkOffice’s (“PTO’s”) position expressed in the Board’s informativedecision in Idle Free Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 7:36 pm
Procedural HistoryHemphill first filed suit against Johnson & Johnson (“J&J”) in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in 1999, alleging that J&J’s Stayfree, Carefree, and Serenity sanitary napkins and adult incontinence products infringed claim 2 of United States Patent No. 4,557,720 (“the ’720 patent”). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:44 pm
Chakrabarty On June 16, 1980, 30 years ago today, the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark patentable subject matter decision in the case of Diamond v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:00 pm
At the Supreme Court, the Justices decided Burwell v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Newman, Eweida v United Kingdom, (Australian International Law Journal, Vol 20, 2013: 183-188).Hanna Lerner, Permissive Constitutions, Democracy, and Religious Freedom in India, Indonesia, Israel, and Turkey, (World Politics, Volume 65, Issue 4 (October 2013), pp. 609-655).Engy Abdelkader, Myanmar's Democracy Struggle: The Impact of Communal Violence Upon Rohingya Women and Youth, (Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, 2014).From SmartCILP:Michael W. [read post]
