Search for: "United States v. Potter"
Results 241 - 260
of 300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2024, 8:10 am
We can start with a result that seems startling, the case of the emotional support parrots.(4) United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
See Jacobellis v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
It is extremely difficult to square the state bar’s version with what the prosecutor said, as recounted in Miller v Pate. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:33 am
Potter. 1998. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:40 pm
In so doing, however, she simply ignores the main arguments against the federal government’s position under that Clause: that the mandate is not “proper” even if “necessary” and that it runs afoul of the five factor test recently applied by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the case of Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 3:01 pm
The Reporters stated that manufacturing defects should continue to be decided under a strict liability regime, but they proposed a radical new concept for design defect cases based on what they claimed was the majority rule in the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
Vergeer en Zonen before District Court of The Hague (Class 46) Poland Polish Patent Office partially invalidates VOGUE registration for Advance Magazine Publishers (Class 46) Poland, brands and billboards (Class 46) South America South American cooperation plan in IP rights (IP tango) Spain Spanish Ministry of Employment auctioning brand ‘Galerías Preciados’ (Class 46) Russia Interbrand’s ranking of Russia’s most valuable brands (IP finance)… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
The couple returned to the United States in 1957. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit limited recovery to the attorney's cost. 472 F. 3d 1370 (2006). [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:42 pm
Potter. 1998. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
" And thus we have an introduction to today’s case, Tersigni v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
It is the finest bench, pound for pound in the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Where does irradiation of food fit into this evolving continuum including the new rule in the United States for lettuce and spinach? [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Where does irradiation of food fit into this evolving continuum including the new rule in the United States for lettuce and spinach? [read post]
