Search for: "United States v. Progressive, Inc." Results 241 - 260 of 794
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2010, 3:00 pm
Justice Department Opposes New Google Book SettlementThis posting was written by Darius Sturmer, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.Despite the substantial progress reflected in the proposed amended settlement agreement in The Authors Guild Inc. et al. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
  Comments and suggestions (especially for compiling a useful student friendly reading list) gratefully received as this remains very much a work in progress. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:24 pm by My name
The suit was filed in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a court that has previously ruled in favor of the league on similar disputes (in NBA v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive Guide for cerebral palsy. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am by Bernard Bell
  Reducing Industrial Accidents Industrial accidents have long caused carnage in the United States.[2] Generally employers can enhance their employees’ safety in two distinct non-exclusive ways. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 4:53 am
XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYThe Court answers the question certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Building Sys., Inc., 58 F.3d 16, 19 (2d Cir. 1995); see also JLM Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
United States “may have opened up a big can of worms. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
United States A new version of KOSA – the Kids Online Safety Act – has been introduced in the Senate. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:24 am
Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:51 am
Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2009) Favors: Employee Law: Federal Pullen Court: United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts Opinion Date: 10/19/09 Cite: Guest-Tek Interactive Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]