Search for: "United States v. Various Articles of Device" Results 241 - 260 of 494
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2016, 4:18 am by INFORRM
Pierre-Louis cited to the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority opinion in Brown v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
*El-Nahal alleged that the installation of such devices having tracking abilities amounted to a property-based search within meaning of United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 1:22 pm by Larry
United States in which the Court of International Trade previously overturned the tariff classification Customs and Border Protection assigned to covers for mobile devices. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 5:11 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
United States Supreme Court, June 2015, the United States Supreme Court ruled that it takes more than a “reasonable person” standard to prove criminal liability. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:06 pm by Xandra Kramer
Furthermore, the parent company claimed that a case against Vedanta is “a device in order to ensure that the real claim, against, KCM, is litigated in the United Kingdom rather than in Zambia” (para 51). [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
None of that is an issue for Android, with or without the right to build devices with round buttons, rounded corners etc.As for statutory interpretation, I already discussed the term "article of manufacture" in a post shortly before Samsung's opening brief. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:05 pm by Dennis Crouch
”  This bit appears to be directed toward giving credence to non-compete and other limits in various states. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge has cut more than US$12 million from damages awarded to an intern who sued a chief executive for sexual harassment and defamation. [read post]