Search for: "Universal Music Publishing, Inc." Results 241 - 260 of 462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2021, 11:27 am by Chris Castle
  First, the Majors identify their interest as that of “major publishers”; not all publishers, not all songwriters, but “major publishers. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:12 pm by @ErikJHeels
Rolling Stone Announces More Five-Star Rated Albums And All I Got Was This Lousy Feed Want to know why the music business is broken? [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 10:21 am by INFORRM
David Rolph, Associate Professor of Media Law, University of Sydney This article was originally published on The Conversation. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:46 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  AB 2257, which preserves the ABC Test for independent contractor classification, expands the universe of available exemptions from this test. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 5:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
He left his property to a trust administered by his executor, Chase Manhattan Bank, for the benefit of Columbia University. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica)   Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP)   Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 5:51 am
By day, Iyer (pictured) heads up Ince & Co's energy litigation team. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Court https://t.co/zRQVGl35MM -> Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-09-12 http://t.co/XGQnOjMwcp -> Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-09-12: Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-09-05 http:… http://t.co/j8NFGdlDcX -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-09-13 http://t.co/wL1BZARZRV -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-09-13: Illegal downloaders get off scot free, as Copyright Tribunal pro… http://t.co/kGeEqDKuiN -> Lenz v… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm by Mark Litwak
§ 101 et seq. as well as common law breach of contract claims against Defendants Steven Spielberg; DW Studios, LLC; Paramount Pictures Corporation; Viacom, Inc.; NBC Universal, Inc.; Universal Pictures Company, Inc.; Universal City Studios, LLP; United International Pictures, B.V.; and Does 1-10,[1] alleging that the motion picture Disturbia — a film produced by Spielberg, owner of DW Studios, LLC, which is in turn a wholly-owned… [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am by GSU Law Student
Bridgeport Music, Inc., No. 13-06004 (C.D. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark without permission: Hilton v… [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
(Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) New Commercial Courts Bill to bring about radical reform in the adjudication of big ticket IP disputes (Spicy IP) Music artistes in tune with Copyright Amendment Bill (Spicy IP) Indian copyright amendments procure cabinet approval (Spicy IP) Does there lie an appeal from S. 21 of the Patents Act? [read post]
9 May 2007, 3:10 pm
AT&T Inc. says it will spend as much as $1.4 billion more than anticipated on rolling out its new TV system, called U-verse. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Somraj Singh, (not precedential) (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps DJ David Guetta – DJ David Guetta sues over use of name on compilation album cover: Payday Records, Ultra Records v Thrive Records (The Trademark Blog) Stanford University – Stanford University sues Sir Allen Stanford, patron of West Indian cricket, for trade mark infringement (IPKat)         [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Court granted summary judgment to defendants because (1) online music service provider's automatic mix feature did not infringe patent; and (2) internet radio did not infringe patent.Paltalk Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]