Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of"
Results 241 - 260
of 936
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2012, 12:57 am
I was also surprised at how relaxed C&W seemed to be about the matter of registering AAAs. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:27 am
Many harms are not about individual injuries but about systemic dysfunctions, though usually conceived of as individual (pirates, trolls, greedy companies). [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:25 am
Jarrett Builders, Inc., February 20, 2018, Crenshaw, W., Jr.). [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am
In Germany, it is theoretically possible to seek only a prelimininary injunction without ever litigating the same matter in a main proceeding (though either party is free to seek clarification in a main proceeding, and it would be disadvantageous with a view to a subsequent award of fees if a prevailing movant obtained a PI but didn't have it affirmed in a main proceeding.]National lawArt. 58 of the German Patent Act (PatG) states in its current form:The grant of the… [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 11:00 pm
” W. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:57 pm
The Supreme Court has cautioned that “[a]n injunction is a drastic and extraordinary remedy, which should not be granted as a matter of course. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
Earley and Kenneth W. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
There arose from the OpenAI controversy an inference that several of the company’s constituent groups did not fully appreciate the nonprofit-grounded corporate structure and the authority granted to the nonprofit’s governing board. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:27 pm
Ford Motor Co., 680 S.E.2d 77 (W. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 8:27 am
Maatman, Jr. and Mark W. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:22 am
"[T]he test forsufficiency is whether the disclosure of the application relied upon reasonably conveys to thoseskilled in the art that the inventor had possession of the claimed subject matter as of the filingdate. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 2:49 pm
Dep't of Envtl. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
This basic question has three different answers, all regularly used in any given jurisdiction—this is not a matter of circuit splits. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
., an Internet domain name registration company located in Kirkland, Washington. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am
[Since] the only expert who offered an opinion . . . about ghostwriting and company-funded publications was Parisian, this prong of [defendant’s] omnibus motion is granted. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
There’s no hard threshold for misleadingness, and while 9.2% isn’t overwhelming, the court couldn’t conclude it was insubstantial as a matter of law. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 11:48 am
Carothers replied "Because we don't have the money. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:02 pm
So how does this matter to Katherine Jackson and the Canadian man she granted her approval to (in exchange for several hundred thousands of dollars, of course)? [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:42 pm
Doesn’t matter if the mark isn’t eligible for protection in certain jurisdictions – geographic indicators. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 7:05 am
Depending on company procedures, this should involve a written request and possibly a new W-4 form for tax withholdings in your new name. 4. [read post]
