Search for: "WILLIAMS v. DEAL et al" Results 241 - 260 of 280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
  In particular, I discuss paradoxes in defining cybersecurity goals, and in dealing with nation-state threat actors. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
The doctrine of inherent anticipation (particularly after Schering Co. v Geneva Pharmaceuticals Inc. et Al., commented here - see also, in the UK, Merrell Dow v H N Norton & Co), may lead to similar distortions. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
So Johnson, McNamara, Bush, Nixon, Kissinger, Bush II, Cheney, Rumsfeld, et al - - unlike the soon to be hung (or, by the time this appears, perhaps the recently hung) Saddam - - will never see the inside of a dock or a prison let alone stand on a gallows. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm by R Grace Rodriguez
 READ BELOW FOR THE WHOLE DECISION 2011 WL 2612835Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115, restricts citation of unpublished opinions in California courts.Court of Appeal, Fifth District, California.Mark DEMUCHA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE INC., Defendant and Respondent.No. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am by Eugene Volokh
The proposed federal criminal code drafted in 1828 by Edward Livingston—who had earlier participated in drafting the Louisiana Civil Code, was at the time a Congressman (and soon to be Senator) from Louisiana, and would later become Secretary of State—expressly covered "threats of withdrawing custom or dealing in business or trade … or any other threat of injury" aimed at influencing votes. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Recognizing the worst in government transparency. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Anthony Boykin, et al., 10 Cr. 391 (CM), unsealed on May 13, 2010, charged 60 defendants with drug distribution offenses, many of whom were part of the Newburgh Bloods. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:09 pm by Schachtman
Talcott, et al., “Asbestos-associated Diseases in a Cohort of Cigarette-Filter Workers,” 321 N.Engl.J.Med. 1220 (1989). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
The courts, which play a major role in interpreting intellectual property laws, have their own views, views which sometimes shift or change in response to the cases and challenges they have to deal with. [read post]