Search for: "Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes" Results 241 - 260 of 559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The majority's analysis relies heavily on the discussion of Rule 23(b)(2) class certification in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm by AALRR
  In a summary disposition, the Supreme Court granted the petition for certiori, vacated the judgment, and remained the case back to the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:35 am by Adam Santucci
UPDATE: You may have heard the cheers emanating from Bentonville, Arkansas (the location of Wal-Mart's corporate headquarters), and the corporate headquarters of other large employers following the United States Supreme Court’s announcement of its decision in Wal-Mart, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 10:13 am by Sara Hutchins Jodka
May 30, 2013), the Sixth Circuit affirmed the denial of a class certification bid in a sexual discrimination hiring case à la WalMart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
The Third Circuit rejected plaintiffs’ arguments that the district court abused its discretion by overstepping its authority in declining to certify a settlement class and in misapplying Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
The Third Circuit rejected plaintiffs’ arguments that the district court abused its discretion by overstepping its authority in declining to certify a settlement class and in misapplying Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:47 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  Among other things, we will analyze the Supreme Court’s treatment of statistical evidence in the recent Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:36 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 603 F. 3d 571, 652 (9th Cir. 2010) (dissenting opinion). [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:32 am by Wystan Ackerman
Justice Scalia made major contributions to class action law,  writing the Supreme Court’s opinions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]