Search for: "Williams v. Wright" Results 241 - 260 of 456
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Since the Supreme Court has observed, first in the seminal case of Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm by Gary P. Rodrigues
Rand by William KaplanA Trying Question: The Jury in Nineteenth Centre Canada by R. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 4:05 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Shields, 818 S.W.2d 752, 754 (Tex. 1991) (holding that dismissal with prejudice functions as final determination on merits); see also Williams v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:11 am by Brendan Kevenides
Sherwin Williams Co., 975 F.Supp. 639 (1997), which issued the opposite holding just five years prior. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
Wright, 98 Minn. 477, 478-79, 108 N.W. 865 (1906) (each dog owner is liable separately for the damages done by his animal); Anderson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In my last column, Part I of this Two-Part series, I argued that lower courts are justified in paying (indeed perhaps required to pay) close attention to Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion in this summer’s blockbuster Burwell v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts can revisit their prior rulings, higher courts can change the legal landscape against which lower courts make decisions (as the Supreme Court in fact did in the immigration regulation setting in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
Wright, Fifth Circuit: On remand from the Supreme Court, the court vacated and remanded three cases because the restitution amount must comport with the relative role of the individual in the causal process that underlies the victim's general losses. 10. [read post]