Search for: "A. G."
Results 2581 - 2600
of 65,538
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2023, 8:25 am
So long as there is one visa kept available, it would provide the legal basis for an I-485 filing under a DFF, and this would be consistent with INA 245(a)(3) as well as 8 CFR 245.1(g)(1). [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:12 am
Readings Recommended by Professor Matthew DysonSacco, R. (1991), Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law. 39(1) American Journal of Comparative Law 1.Samuel, G. (2009), Can legal reasoning be demystified?. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:16 am
Altamente recomendable es el estupendo comentario del abogado y profesor Diego Gómez en su blog. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 10:30 pm
While other providers of high-risk AI systems are generally subject to the obligations contained in Articles 16-25, providers of general purpose AI would only be bound by a lesser set of obligations: providing their name and trademark (Article 16 aa)); conducting a conformity assessment (Article 16 e)); registration (Article 16f)); corrective actions (Article 16 g)); CE marking (Article 16i)); demonstrate conformity (Article 16 j)); appointing an authorised representative (Article 25); EU… [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 1:00 pm
Mögliche Kriterien wären eine grosse Zahl von betroffenen Personen in der Schweiz oder ein grosser Bestand an Daten über Personen in der Schweiz.Ein Profiling mit hohem Risiko ist gemäss Art. 5 lit. g nDSG ein «Profiling, das ein hohes Risiko für die Persönlichkeit oder die Grundrechte der betroffenen Person mit sich bringt, indem es zu einer Verknüpfung von Daten führt, die eine Beurteilung wesentlicher Aspekte der Persönlichkeit einer… [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Judge Lisa G. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
Announcement, Blaine Saito Leaves Northeastern For Ohio State John G. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Plaintiff then initiated a CPLR Article 78 proceeding in Supreme Court challenging the Appeals Board's determination, which action was transferred to the Appellate Division pursuant to CPLR §7804(g). [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Plaintiff then initiated a CPLR Article 78 proceeding in Supreme Court challenging the Appeals Board's determination, which action was transferred to the Appellate Division pursuant to CPLR §7804(g). [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 1:32 am
Federico G. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 2:21 pm
Chief Justice John G. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
Topics may include:• Current protest trends at CMS and comparisons to HHS and other civilian agencies;• Recompetes v. new requirements – understanding the incumbent advantage and how to ensure fairness for all;• Joint Venture (JV) and Mentor-Protégé JV arrangements and small business set aside decisions;• Price realism / avoiding the “race to the bottom”;• Best value trade off decisions v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:54 pm
Supreme Court’s 2022 gun rights case, has created a world of problems, as illustrated by the case of 57 year-old Jessie Bullock of Mississippi, who served 17 years for killing a man in a bar fight. 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1), enacted in 1938, creates a lifetime ban on the possession […] The post Bruen ruling creates more problems than it solves first appeared on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:54 am
Here [14]We consider the Washington Supreme Court’s reasoning to be persuasive and note that other states also consider a specific, recent claim of Native heritage to be a “reason to know” the child is an Indian child.47 Tribes have many methods to determine membership or eligibility for membership, including lineal descent or blood quantum.48Additionally, a tribe may enroll an eligible child after being notified by a state agency that the child is involved in a child custody… [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
John G. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:48 am
District Judge Edwin G. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 3:44 am
Was G 2/21 even about plausibility? [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:42 am
Part 2 will consider the Court of Appeal's interpretation of G 2/21. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 8:14 pm
“Gun control laws in California and beyond in peril as Supreme Court expands 2nd Amendment”: David G. [read post]
