Search for: "AT&T"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 881,747
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm
Dep’t of State, Lead Gov’t Info. [read post]
9 May 2018, 12:24 am
The main request is thus not allowable.This decision T 2070/13 (pdf) has European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2018:T207013.20180412.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
9 May 2018, 12:24 am
The main request is thus not allowable.This decision T 2070/13 (pdf) has European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2018:T207013.20180412.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:00 am
In these circumstances, the board considers that the aspect of whether or not the line of argument is of prima facie relevance, an aspect which may also be taken into account in the context of Article 13(1) EPC, is outweighed by the aspects of complexity and the procedural stage at which the argument had been brought forward.Accordingly, the board, exercising its discretion, decided not to admit said line of argument (Article 13(1) RPBA).(...)This decision T 0293/12 (pdf) has… [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
It is part of the professional task of representatives to decide independently – that is, without assistance from the Board – how to pursue their cases (see T 506/91 [2.3]). [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:37 am
This decision T 0353/18 (pdfpdf) has European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2020:T035318.20201111. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:25 am
The case is remitted to the examining division with the order to grant a patent in the following version:(...)This decision T 1900/16 (pdf) has European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2020:T190016.20200417. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
Whether this is correct is certainly open to question.In sum, T 1201/14 provides an excellent summary of the EPO’s case law on the transfer of priority rights, but does not clarify which national law applies to the transfer of the priority right. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 11:30 am
Lewis") and Andrew T. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 10:48 am
AT&T having data trouble in parts of Florida -- Engadget Mobile. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
A party is adversely affected if a decision does not accede to its requests (established jurisprudence; see T 961/00 [1]). [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 7:26 pm
‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’ vote fails: Reaction Senate halts ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ repeal The U.S. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:25 am
“Don’t, Ask, Don’t Tell” might be a thing of the past, but that doesn’t mean Jack K., a third-year law student at Harvard, can serve as a military lawyer. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:31 pm
Gates, discussing whether or not the Senate will vote to repeal “don’t ask, don’t tell” before the end of this year.This legal uncertainty is not going away anytime soon. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
“We trust that AT&T will not take it personally” concluded the ruling. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:56 am
Don’t claim, when you’ve missed a filing deadline in a wage and hour class action certification, that you had a family emergency in Mexico City when Instagram photos show you to be in New York at the time [ABA Journal; Lina Franco, sanctioned $10,000 by a U.S. magistrate judge, sought to withdraw untimely certification motion “first with prejudice and then without prejudice”] Tags: don't Don’t is a post from Overlawyered -… [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 11:16 am
But what if you don’t play golf and don’t want to learn? [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Generally, short phrases are not protected under copyright law (we can't say for sure whether this phrase qualifies as"short"). [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
(As far as the requirement for the payment of the opposition fee within the TFO is concerned, see T 152/85 [1])According to the wording of A 99(1), the TFO is triggered exclusively by the fact that a European patent has been granted and a mention of the grant has been published in the EPB, and not by the fact that a patent specification has been published. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 5:22 pm
ELECTRONICS THAT DON'T SUCK: Dr. [read post]
