Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 12:10 pm
Quinn Heraty reports on the trademark battle to make us forget SPAM v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 1:24 am
In any event, the Court of Appeal stated that Andrew Smith J's decision was plainly correct and that a single arbitrator should have been appointed.This case highlights the consistent approach of the English courts in seeking to minimise appeals arising from arbitrations under the Act. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
Legal scholarship: First Statute of Westminster [1275] is cited in attorney's briefAmalfitano v Rosenberg, 2009 NY Slip Op 01069, Decided on February 12, 2009, Court of AppealsPrecedents and legislative history are frequently referred to in briefs and court decisions. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 5:28 am
This judgment Re Murray (deceased) Crummer v AAI Limited ABN 2020 QSC 155 dealt with the meaning of a householder’s liability policy exclusion for liability for death or injury of anyone who usually lives at the insured address. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 1:33 pm
V. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 7:25 am
V. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm
Supreme Court has granted certiorari to hear a major case on the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 8:34 am
A recent post at Time.com discussed how the US v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:42 pm
Abbott v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:30 am
And in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:07 pm
In a case that the Supreme Court decided in March 1997 (Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 12:59 am
Interestingly, with regard to this last issue, the Constitutional Court refers to the CJEU decision C-146/13 Spain v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 1:17 pm
Click below for summary and comment by Rosalind English or here to read the full judgment SUMMARY The respondents were animal rights activists whose stated aim was to close down an establishment which conducted clinical testing on live animals. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:22 am
One difference between Australian and English defamation law, which might have given a judge pause when applying the approach in Jameel in Australia, is the availability of a defence of triviality under the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 33 and equivalent provisions in the other states and territories. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 1:07 pm
The Baker v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 9:25 am
Sincerely, Robert V. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
The state is under various obligations under Article 2. [read post]
