Search for: "House v. House"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 41,216
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2014, 4:18 am
The Supreme Court in Blaylock v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:14 am
” “In Occidental Exploration and Production Company (OEPC) v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 4:23 am
Jhawer v Vatts. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 10:00 am
v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 8:55 am
Clinton v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:32 am
Montano, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Lambeth (2024) EWHC 249 (Admin) A short note on this judicial review. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 12:42 pm
A. had applied to Islington as homeless and Islington had accepted the full housing duty. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:02 pm
Digsby v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:48 am
The KSC affirmed in State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
Royal Borough of Kingston-Upon-Thames v Moss (2019) EWHC 3261 (Ch) Ever since Jones v London Borough of Southwark (2016) EWHC 457 (Ch) (our report), the position on water rates taken as rent by a number of London Councils and Housing Associations under agreements with Thames Water has been conflicted. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
., d/b/a Cedar Point, an amusement park based out of Sandusky, Ohio, apparently refused to house employees who were 30 and over (unless they were entertainers), older out-of-town workers were unable to resume their seasonal employment with the company.Believing that such conduct violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:02 am
Affordable Housing Appeals Cases - 2013-R-0033You asked for a discussion of the disposition of proposals to develop affordable housing pursuant to CGS § 8-30g. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 2:10 pm
" In Moran v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 3:34 pm
A brief note on Hussain v LB Waltham Forest [2015] EWCA Civ 14, which concerns the definition of ‘other violence’ in s.177(1) of the Housing Act 1996. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 7:37 am
Two days ago, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Fernandez v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:38 am
As Adam and Chris discuss, Chevron made a brief appearance in King when the Court explained it did not apply because the interpretive question had "deep 'economic and political significance.'" In Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 4:05 am
Whether using generally available historic preservation funds to repair or restore a house of worship constitutes a “religious use” that falls outside the scope of Trinity Lutheran [v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
Washington D.C. is "the window through which the world looks into our house," wrote the Justice Department in the Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae in Brown v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
