Search for: "Louisiana Supreme Court"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 6,289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2020, 3:50 am
Supreme Court [in McGirt v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:56 pm
Louisiana (2008). [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 9:24 am
Because the generic federal offense requires specific intent, and the Louisiana Supreme Court has explicitly maintained that the state statute requires only general intent, we find that it is not a match. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:53 am
If the Supreme Court weighs in, it would have the potential to strike down billions of dollars worth of abusive consumer class actions, especially the "harm-less lawsuits" that Michael Greve and I have frequently criticized. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:37 am
The court cited the Louisiana Supreme Court decision of Rosell v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 12:01 pm
We expect a decision on whether or not the Supreme Court will take up this case by Spring Break '13.To be continued... [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:08 am
In fact, portions of this statute are expressly limited to individuals of legal age, and the Louisiana Supreme Court has specifically held that it does not protect a party from potential liability arising from the sale or furnishing of alcohol to a minor. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 4:09 am
Also, the Louisiana Supreme Court has specifically held that the statute does not protect a party from potential liability arising from the sale or furnishing of alcohol to a minor. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 4:02 pm
In fact, portions of this statute are expressly limited to individuals of legal age, and the Louisiana Supreme Court has specifically held that it does not protect a party from potential liability arising from the sale or furnishing of alcohol to a minor. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 11:59 am
Take Louisiana, for example, where the Supreme Court is considering a law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges at a local hospital – a law virtually identical to the one the Supreme Court already struck down in 2016 in Whole Women’s Health v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:16 am
Supreme Court will reopen the issue of prosecutorial misconduct when it hears oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 7:26 pm
Louisiana, 577 U.S. __, 136 S. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 10:37 pm
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (Lance M. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 7:41 am
In 1935, the Mississippi Supreme Court recognized that, The courts have had considerable difficulty in determining what constitutes the total loss of a building by fire within the meaning of policies of insurance.1 The Court further recognized that, [T]wo conflicting rules have been adopted, which are as follows: One rule-and it is the earlier one -provides that a total loss has been sustained whenever the building has been so injured as to lose its identify… [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 10:33 am
This just in: The Louisiana Supreme Court has reversed the $300 million+ state Medicare verdict in Caldwell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:05 am
* According to Justice Jeanette Theriot Knoll of the Louisiana Supreme Court, the SCOTUS decision in Obergefell was not only "horrific," but it was also “a complete and unnecessary insult to the people of Louisiana. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
Eventually, after years of litigation, the Louisiana Supreme Court unanimously rejected that argument. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 3:54 am
At The Marshall Project, Andrew Cohen notes that the court “refused on Monday to intercede in one of the biggest judicial scandals in modern Louisiana history,” whose “underlying facts … turn on systemic judicial misconduct in Louisiana that is unusual even by the standards of one of the most perennially troubled justice systems in the nation. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Gesaman points out that only one Supreme Court case, in 1947, addressed the issue of botched executions; in that case, Louisiana ex rel. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 7:26 pm
Things got so bad that the Louisiana Supreme Court passed a rule allowing out of state attorneys to have a one year blanket pro hac vice status, but only for those who were representing indigent defendants. [read post]
