Search for: "MATTER OF JOHNSON"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 6,805
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2016, 11:31 am
Johnson & Johnson, 745 F.2d 1437, 1449-1454, 223 U.S.P.Q. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm
., a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, paid $18 million to resolve allegations it caused health care providers to submit false claims to Medicare and other federal health care programs by marketing and distributing its sinus spacer product for use as a drug delivery device without FDA approval. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:34 am
Johnson and Mr. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
This was upheld by the Court of Appeal.Brian Cordery reminded the audience of the general principles relating to amendments set out in Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100 and Johnson v Gore Wood [2000] UKHL 65 which prevent re-litigation in circumstances not amounting to strict res judicata. [read post]
Confidence about UK ratification of Unified Patent Court Agreement, but with politics you never know
6 Dec 2016, 8:16 pm
’ In any event, Johnson is ‘pretty confident the UK will get through all this ok because the Baroness said what she did as a matter of Government policy, so obviously this has been approved higher up, and of course the Baroness will herself be on the relevant Lords’ Committee. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
So, none of this balancing may matter at all for Netflix members who have agreed to the terms of use and EULA by virtue of having a membership (it has, in fact, become quite common for internet-based services to include such limitations in agreements). [read post]
Users will have to deal with uncertainty about post Brexit participation UK in Unitary Patent system
2 Dec 2016, 5:47 am
If the other states had gone ahead it would have been difficult to join in the system later,’ Bristows partner Alan Johnson says in an article of the Law Gazette. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 8:50 am
To be sure, the satirists like Christopher Johnson still have their occasional field-day with the utterly vacuous outpourings from those the Congregations have chosen as their spokespersons, but your Curmudgeon has lost his taste for a sport that amounts to shooting fish in a barrel. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:59 pm
Johnson, a criminal case that is the real reason I am going to the arguments tomorrow. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 10:43 am
Johnson was decided by a bare 5-4 majority.The justices did not divide on liberal/conservative lines in that case. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 5:28 am
Johnson. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:12 am
Papers will be evaluated by a prestigious panel of subject matter experts, to be led by Judge James E. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
That case was Johnson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
That case was Johnson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:19 am
By Marjorie Johnson, J.D. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
If Johnson sues Miller, you would expect the two people on the verdict form to be Johnson and Miller. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:55 am
Personal leanings on the matter are not supposed to be involved, and juries are carefully selected from a larger pool to try and control the amount of bias toward either plaintiff or defendant. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:35 am
By Marjorie Johnson, J.D. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 12:01 am
The Court was ruling on a matter (an action of replevin) related to claims of land title in Wisconsin contested by Native tribes. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 5:25 am
By Marjorie Johnson, J.D. [read post]
