Search for: "May v. State" Results 2581 - 2600 of 119,555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2011, 10:55 am by utahdefenders
Police Power Enlarged by Court The Indiana Supreme Court ruled in Barnes v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm by Gareth Davies
It may be noted as a preliminary, that what the policy in Commune d’Ans is not about is the neutral functioning of the state: removing the signs does not change the substance. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office are permanently enjoined from implementing the Final Claims and Continuations Rules. [read post]
22 May 2007, 11:10 am
Another invitation brief is in, and it looks like the Court may have another case for its OT2007 line-up: the United States (in a brief available here) recommended that cert. be granted in No. 06-856, LaRue v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:35 am
Some readers may remember the Jan. 28, 2009 Court of Appeals decision in the case of Dale Redmond v.... [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, citing Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, and Matter of Banegas v GEICO Ins. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, citing Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, and Matter of Banegas v GEICO Ins. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 2:33 am by John Diekman
Practice point: A court may consider evidentiary material submitted by a defendant in support of a motion to dismiss a complaint, pursuant to CPLR 3211[c].Student note: When evidentiary material is considered, and the motion has not been converted to one for summary judgment, the criterion is whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether the plaintiff has stated one. [read post]