Search for: "Patent Space" Results 2581 - 2600 of 3,522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2011, 11:10 am by Robert Oszakiewski
  Section 103 would direct the Secretary of Commerce to award competitive grants for the acquisition/renovation of space to serve as nanomanufacturing "incubators", defined as meaning an entity affiliated with or housed in a degree-granting institution that provides space and coordinated and specialized services to entrepreneurial businesses that work in the field of nanotechnology commercialization and that meets selected criteria during the businesses'… [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm by Dr Mark Summerfield
  In fact, we thought that there would be plenty of time and space for articles containing our general musings on the history and philosophy of patent laws and innovation policy. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm by Eric Schweibenz
ALJ Rogers determined that there is good cause for setting a 17-month target date in this investigation in light of the six respondents and 108 patent claims at issue. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm by Eva Arevuo
The 23,000 square foot store will be Apple’s largest, overtaking the largest London store occupying a historic space in Covent Garden’s piazza. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:05 am by Alex Gasser
  Canon argued the ‘427 patent teaches that the amount of blank space that results from a standard definition image displayed on a high-definition aspect ratio is minimized when the aspect ratio of the screen is between the standard aspect ratio of 4:3 and the high definition ratio of 16:9. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Welcome to another Blawg Review, hosted this week by the Patent Baristas. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 4:59 am by Michelle Claverol
The insured’s direct competitor leased a space in the same building, and the two companies were competing for an exclusive contract with General Motors. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 10:01 am by royblack
If patent law, then some engineering. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:06 am by David M. Fry
In In re Armodafinil Patent Litigation, C.A. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 10:44 am by Eric Schweibenz
ALJ Rogers determined that there is good cause for setting a 17-month target date in this investigation in light of the 7 respondents and 45 patent claims at issue. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:51 am by Jeff Shieh
Last week, I had the pleasure of attending and speaking at the National Association of Patent Practitioners (NAPP) Annual Meeting. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 8:29 pm by Doug Isenberg
Impulse Technology filed the suit in federal court in Delaware, accusing Microsoft and several game makers — including Electronic Arts, Ubisoft, and THQ — of violating patents related to, among other things, tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:38 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Patent Nos. 6,308,565; 6,430,997; 6,765,726; 6,876,496; 7,359,121; and 7,791,808 describing a “System and method for tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space,” and U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 6:16 am by Andrew Ramonas
“These emails are meant to be an educational resource in which information is provided on issues and trends in the IP space,” Maebius said in a statement. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:52 am
for drawing the Kats' attention to an excellent summary on Patent Docs which was posted under the descriptively helpful title "USPTO Revises Requirements for Patent Prosecution Highway Programs". [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:39 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Daniela Nadj, The culturalisation of identity in an age of 'ethnic conflict'-depoliticised gender in ICTY wartime sexual violence jurisprudence Debdatta Chowdhury, Space, identity, territory: Marichjhapi Massacre, 1979 Kay Lalor, Constituting sexuality: rights, politics and power in the gay rights movement Laura Niada, The human right to medicines in relation to patents in sub-Saharan Africa: some critical remarks Nlerum S. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It was argued in essence that the patent application as filed did not comprise experimental data showing the claimed effect. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Since, as stated above, shaft 16 was explicitly not intended to be deformed, it does not represent a riveting portion.Since D28 does not disclose all features of claim 1 of the patent in suit, D27 represents the first filing of the invention according to the patent in suit. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
Early booking is advised since the Hardwicke Library has limited space. [read post]