Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2009, 1:49 pm
If, as the Court reasoned in Roper v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
United States, and US Airways v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:28 am
The Court’s 2010 opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:51 pm
Justice Scalia’s opinion for the majority begins by quoting Aramco on that presumption: “legislation of Congress, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 11:07 am
& Annuity v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:46 am
” “According to the department, without the judicially monitored restrictions, Google’s control over this key asset “would have substantially lessened competition among providers of comparative flight search websites in the United States, resulting in reduced choice and less innovation for consumers. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:20 pm
In this follow-up case, a group of plaintiffs that included several states sued five electric-power companies, which together are responsible for nearly ten percent of all human emissions of carbon dioxide in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 3:19 pm
For example, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:22 am
" The first post, regarding the state of the docket, is here. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:57 pm
Back in the day, some Circuits of the United States Court of Appeal embraced an asymmetric standard of review of district court decisions concerning the admissibility of expert witness opinion evidence. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:53 am
Pp. 15-16.523 F. 3d 1078, affirmed.ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUITStevens, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:43 am
The circumstance was most apparent because the argument followed immediately upon United States v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:50 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:24 am
(I haven't read all the amici, so it's possible others made a historical argument; the United States did not in its brief, apart from a couple citiations to the Federalist). [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:46 am
United States (consolidated with two other cases), which involves the effect of the dual-officeholder ban on military judges. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; In United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm
United States, so it is hard to be wildly enthusiastic about any of them. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 8:25 am
” EEOC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:26 am
Sprint/United Management Co. v. [read post]
