Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 2581 - 2600 of 3,526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2011, 11:30 pm
Accession got it dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction, whereupon Accession filed an infringement action in New Jersey, its home turf. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm by Peter Tillers
He has been awarded grants by German states for development of new ways of teaching functional illiterates mathematics, together with Marie-Cecile Bertau for her Gilgamesh project, as well as for his Theory of Trust project. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Mean-while, Accession retained legal counsel in New Jersey. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:47 am by The Dear Rich Staff
 When Hand decided National Comics, the United States was the only country in which copyright was forfeited if no notice was provided. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:35 am by admin
Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey April 6 charged a mergers and acquisitions attorney and a stock trader with conspiracy, securities fraud and other violations over their alleged roles in a long-running insider trading scheme that netted more than $32 million in illicit profits (United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
Lowenfeld write, “it is virtually impossible to explain to French or Dutch or Japanese lawyers that a judgment originating in their country may be enforceable in New York but not in New Jersey. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by John P. Ahlers
New Jersey Dept. of Transportation, 794 Atlantic 2nd 141 (N.J. 2002) a contractor fared better. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:26 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey was recently asked to determine whether to uphold a New Jersey law requiring merchants to collect zip code information from purchasers of gift cards – which are also known as “stored value cards” (“SVC”). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:16 am by Jason R. Tuvel
Therefore, shopping center owners will be required under the Bill to erect signage stating the price per unit of time, unit of voltage, or other measure of usage, as determined by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (the “BPU”) to be charged to the motorist for such service. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:16 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey recently decided that a pregnant employee who was fired was not permitted to sue for gender discrimination under New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”) N.J.S.A. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:59 pm by Sheila Velez Martinez
She ended up in a privately-run detention center in Elizabeth, New Jersey, from which she could have been deported at any time. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
 Lot’s of out of state plaintiffs flock to favorable state court forums – particularly in Philadephia and New Jersey – that also happen to be the home states of pharmaceutical defendants. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by INFORRM
In Young, the United States Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit concluded that two Connecticut newspapers did not subject themselves to the jurisdiction of Virginia courts by posting on the Internet news articles that allegedly defamed the warden of a Virginia prison. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:02 am by Brian A. Comer
Jurors also found that J&J warning label information on Risperdal was deceptive.The state’s case centered on drug-safety claims that New Brunswick, New Jersey-based J&J and Janssen made in November 2003 correspondence to about 700,000 doctors across the U.S., including 7,200 in South Carolina.The U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:49 am by Nabiha Syed
United States and Tolentino v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am by John Elwood
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 10-388; Justice Alito, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Scalia and Thomas filed this opinion respecting the denial of certiorari. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am by Brian A. Comer
Risperdal is different from other antipsychotic medicines and “doctors needed to know that,” he added.Jurors will begin deliberating the case tomorrow.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]