Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
SSHD, Lord Kerr stated, “in reaching decisions that will affect a child, a primacy of importance must be accorded to his or her best interests. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
SSHD, Lord Kerr stated, “in reaching decisions that will affect a child, a primacy of importance must be accorded to his or her best interests. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
In particular, Lord Justice Floyd in the IPCom case cited by AbbVie held that English judges should have the discretion to refuse a stay of national proceedings given that the EPO opposition procedure can take many years to resolve. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
It lays down the fundamental structure and essential values of the state. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
A speech by the PCC’s chair Lord Hunt to the PPA conference is available here. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:08 am
Perry and others and then simply states a conclusion. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 11:39 am
Lord Hoffman has in fact stated that the legislative reforms have served to “free the Courts from technical considerations of legal right and to confer a wide power (to do what is fair)…” – O’Neill v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm
For example, in Giorgi Nikolaishvili v. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 2:00 am
The court held that there had been no violation of the Applicant’s right to privacy after a member of the House of Lords named him in Parliament as the subject of sexual harassment allegations, despite an existing court injunction. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:46 am
Two interesting speeches by Supreme Court judges, Lord Neuberger: Towards a European Law and Lord Hope: Sovereignty in Question. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 7:51 am
Reasons for judgement were released today (Mainstream Canada v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 10:11 am
Of course, a state legislature may dictate the terms in which the duress defense may be raised. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:58 pm
The Court of Appeal found that there was sufficient unclarity and range of views in the medical evidence that the question the recorder should have addressed himself to was whether the review officer’s decision was Wednesbury unreasonable: Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 K.B. 223, per Lord Greene MR in particular at 233- 4. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:39 am
It would be an undesirable state of affairs if Swindon lost the power to take action against Mr Redpath merely because he had been evicted. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:10 am
As an example of the usefulness of these, take the case of Abbott v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:36 am
Pierre GoodingOn September 19, 2012, the Third District Court of Appeals decided that a first party plaintiff could not prosecute a claim against a third party defendant in Brady v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in State of Haryana v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 9:10 am
” Sansone v. [read post]
