Search for: "Anthony v State" Results 2601 - 2620 of 5,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
That does not mean that the rights they protect are unlimited or that the proper exercise of judicial review would limit government to the powers enjoyed by a Lockean minimal state. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
(Not to be outdone, we offer our own highly analytical prediction about the likely votes of the Chief Justice and Anthony Kennedy.) [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:10 am
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy (AP Photo/Matt Slocum, 2013file photo) As I noted on Wednesday, Justice Anthony Kennedy expressed little sympathy for the federal government’s textual arguments in King v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:18 am by Andrew Koppelman
Anthony Kennedy loves states’ rights more than he hates Obamacare.Nearly thirty years after he joined the Court, we are still getting to know him. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 7:16 am by Ronald Mann
What makes the case exciting, though, is Justice Anthony Kennedy’s concurrence. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:35 pm by Lyle Denniston
The majority opinion in the state court, issued unsigned but in the name of the court (“per curiam”), sought to refute every argument made for same-sex marriage as a constitutional matter  and lambasted the Supreme Court for making a “moral judgment, not a legal judgment” when it struck down the federal Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
F & V Distribution Co., LLC, 98 A.D.3d 947, 951, 951 N.Y.S.2d 77, 81 (2012) (stating that “the companies failed to observe certain formalities such as keeping certain records“) (emphasis added); Hesni v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
In USA Today, Richard Wolf previews Monday’s oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:56 pm by Eric M. Fraser
The decision in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]