Search for: "Does 1-37" Results 2601 - 2620 of 5,286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2016, 4:30 am by Laney Zhang
This includes the PRC Anti-Terrorism Law that took effect on January 1, 2016. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am by Hutko
 Does the expropriation of rights in one country affect also the copyright status of the work in other countries? [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am by Hutko
 Does the expropriation of rights in one country affect also the copyright status of the work in other countries? [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
Even if ideology (or pragmatism) sometimes does not seem to matter, it still continues to linger in the background both shaping and guiding thinking. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:17 pm by John Floyd
  Sentenced to 37 ½ Years in Prison   That theory certainly should not have been enough to convict Ramirez or support her 37½ -year sentence. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:59 am
Rattana Keo Phuong, 174 Wash.App. 494, 299 P.3d 37 (Washington Court of Appeals 2013) (quoting Jackson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 8:18 am by Robichaud
 For all lawyers in Ontario called less than 10 years, the breakdown is as follows: % of all lawyers in Ontario: 36% Men: 29% Women: 37% Racialized lawyers: 66% Aboriginal lawyers: 53% When one applies those numbers to the Barristers Act, what this means is that “senior counsel” as personified in Group 1 above is overwhelmingly comprised of white men. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:22 am by Michael Geist
EFF argues that the change has enormous implications: What does this surreptitious change from “paragraph” to “subparagraph” mean? [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm
Thomas, No. 5:12–CR–37, 2013 WL 6000484, at *1 (U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
Unlike the limitations and exceptions provisions, this is not a limitation or exception as it does not envision the possibility of permitting a user to circumvent a digital lock. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:03 am by Howard Knopf
Based upon what I heard on January 22, 2016, it does not appear that the Board was noticeably much more “inquisitorial” than usual. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
The TPP does not include an exception for private purposes circumvention. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Securities Act of 1933 does not permit the SEC to bring an enforcement action on behalf of an individual investor; however, individual investors are permitted to bring civil actions under several of its sections as noted below:   ■ Section 5 and Section 12(a)(1) allow purchasers (investors) to sue issuers for offering or selling a non-exempt security without registering it. [read post]